Abstract
Clinic blood pressure (CBP) is generally used for diagnosis and treatment monitoring in hypertension, but target organ damage correlates more closely with home blood pressure (HBP). Eliminating the clinic-home blood pressure difference (CHBPD) would make conventional CBP a more accurate alternative to HBP. This prospective, randomized, open trial compared the effect of a once-daily versus a twice-daily regimen of anti-hypertensive therapy on CHBPD. After a 2-week wash-out period, 85 confirmed stage 1 hypertensive patients were randomized to receive 2 mg trichlormethiazide daily in one (40 subjects) or two (45 subjects) daily doses for 3 weeks. CBP and HBP measurements were taken during the third week of treatment and the CHBPD calculated. After treatment, the systolic and diastolic CHBPD values were significantly greater in the once-daily regimen than in the twice-daily regimen. Conventional CBP should not be used as an alternative to HBP for evaluating prognosis and monitoring anti-hypertensive therapy when using a once-daily regimen.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 111-118 |
Number of pages | 8 |
Journal | Journal of International Medical Research |
Volume | 33 |
Issue number | 1 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 2005 |
Keywords
- Clinic-home blood pressure difference
- Dose frequency
- Hypertension
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Biochemistry
- Cell Biology
- Biochemistry, medical