TY - JOUR
T1 - Economic evaluation for mass vaccination against COVID-19
AU - Wang, Wei Chun
AU - Fann, Jean Ching Yuan
AU - Chang, Ray E.
AU - Jeng, Ya Chung
AU - Hsu, Chen Yang
AU - Chen, Hsiu Hsi
AU - Liu, Jin Tan
AU - Yen, Ming-Fang
N1 - Funding Information:
This study was supported by Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan ( MOST 109-2327-B-002-009 ).
Publisher Copyright:
© 2021
PY - 2021/6
Y1 - 2021/6
N2 - Background: Vaccine is supposed to be the most effective means to prevent COVID-19 as it may not only save lives but also reduce productivity loss due to resuming pre-pandemic activities. Providing the results of economic evaluation for mass vaccination is of paramount importance for all stakeholders worldwide. Methods: We developed a Markov decision tree for the economic evaluation of mass vaccination against COVID-19. The effectiveness of reducing outcomes after the administration of three COVID-19 vaccines (BNT162b2 (Pfizer-BioNTech), mRNA-1273 (Moderna), and AZD1222 (Oxford-AstraZeneca)) were modelled with empirical parameters obtained from literatures. The direct cost of vaccine and COVID-19 related medical cost, the indirect cost of productivity loss due to vaccine jabs and hospitalization, and the productivity loss were accumulated given different vaccination scenarios. We reported the incremental cost-utility ratio and benefit/cost (B/C) ratio of three vaccines compared to no vaccination with a probabilistic approach. Results: Moderna and Pfizer vaccines won the greatest effectiveness among the three vaccines under consideration. After taking both direct and indirect costs into account, all of the three vaccines dominated no vaccination strategy. The results of B/C ratio show that one dollar invested in vaccine would have USD $13, USD $23, and USD $28 in return for Moderna, Pfizer, and AstraZeneca, respectively when health and education loss are considered. The corresponding figures taking value of the statistical life into account were USD $176, USD $300, and USD $443. Conclusion: Mass vaccination against COVID-19 with three current available vaccines is cost-saving for gaining more lives and less cost incurred.
AB - Background: Vaccine is supposed to be the most effective means to prevent COVID-19 as it may not only save lives but also reduce productivity loss due to resuming pre-pandemic activities. Providing the results of economic evaluation for mass vaccination is of paramount importance for all stakeholders worldwide. Methods: We developed a Markov decision tree for the economic evaluation of mass vaccination against COVID-19. The effectiveness of reducing outcomes after the administration of three COVID-19 vaccines (BNT162b2 (Pfizer-BioNTech), mRNA-1273 (Moderna), and AZD1222 (Oxford-AstraZeneca)) were modelled with empirical parameters obtained from literatures. The direct cost of vaccine and COVID-19 related medical cost, the indirect cost of productivity loss due to vaccine jabs and hospitalization, and the productivity loss were accumulated given different vaccination scenarios. We reported the incremental cost-utility ratio and benefit/cost (B/C) ratio of three vaccines compared to no vaccination with a probabilistic approach. Results: Moderna and Pfizer vaccines won the greatest effectiveness among the three vaccines under consideration. After taking both direct and indirect costs into account, all of the three vaccines dominated no vaccination strategy. The results of B/C ratio show that one dollar invested in vaccine would have USD $13, USD $23, and USD $28 in return for Moderna, Pfizer, and AstraZeneca, respectively when health and education loss are considered. The corresponding figures taking value of the statistical life into account were USD $176, USD $300, and USD $443. Conclusion: Mass vaccination against COVID-19 with three current available vaccines is cost-saving for gaining more lives and less cost incurred.
KW - Cost-benefit analysis
KW - Cost-utility analysis
KW - COVID-19
KW - Vaccine
KW - Value of statistical life
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85107446452&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85107446452&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jfma.2021.05.020
DO - 10.1016/j.jfma.2021.05.020
M3 - Article
C2 - 34108119
AN - SCOPUS:85107446452
SN - 0929-6646
VL - 120
SP - S95-S105
JO - Journal of the Formosan Medical Association
JF - Journal of the Formosan Medical Association
ER -