TY - JOUR
T1 - Early identification of delayed wound healing in complex diabetic foot ulcers treated with a dermal regeneration template
T2 - a novel clinical target and its risk factors
AU - Tai, Ting Yu
AU - Lin, Kuan Jie
AU - Chang, Hao Yun
AU - Wu, Yi Chun
AU - Huang, Ching Uen
AU - Lin, Xin Yi
AU - Tsai, Feng Chou
AU - Tsai, Ching Sung
AU - Chen, Yu Han
AU - Wang, Fu Yu
AU - Chang, Shun Cheng
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
Copyright © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.
PY - 2024/2/1
Y1 - 2024/2/1
N2 - BACKGROUND: The dermal regeneration template (DRT), a tissue-engineered skin substitute composing a permanent dermal matrix and an upper temporary silicone layer that serves as the epidermis, has demonstrated efficacy in treating uncomplicated diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs). Our institution has obtained good outcomes with DRT in patients with more complicated DFUs. Because of its chronicity, the authors are working to identify a clinical target that anticipates delayed healing early in the treatment in addition to determining the risk factors linked to this endpoint to increase prevention. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective single-center study analyzed patients with DFUs who underwent wound reconstruction using DRT between 2016 and 2021. The patients were categorized into poor or good graft-take groups based on their DRT status on the 21st day after the application. Their relationship with complete healing (CH) rate at day 180 was analyzed. Variables were collected for risk factors for poor graft take at day 21. Independent risk factors were identified after multivariable analysis. The causes of poor graft take were also reported. RESULTS: This study examined 80 patients (38 and 42 patients in the poor and good graft-take groups, respectively). On day 180, the CH rate was 86.3% overall, but the poor graft-take group had a significantly lower CH rate (76.3 vs. 95.2%, P =0.021) than the good graft-take group. Our analysis identified four independent risk factors: transcutaneous oxygen pressure less than 30 mmHg (odds ratio, 154.14), off-loading device usage (0.03), diabetic neuropathy (6.51), and toe wound (0.20). The most frequent cause of poor graft take was infection (44.7%), followed by vascular compromise (21.1%) and hematoma (15.8%). CONCLUSION: Our study introduces the novel concept of poor graft take at day 21 associated with delayed wound healing. Four independent risk factors were identified, which allows physicians to arrange interventions to mitigate their effects or select patients more precisely. DRT represents a viable alternative to address DFUs, even in complicated wounds. A subsequent split-thickness skin graft is not always necessary to achieve CH.
AB - BACKGROUND: The dermal regeneration template (DRT), a tissue-engineered skin substitute composing a permanent dermal matrix and an upper temporary silicone layer that serves as the epidermis, has demonstrated efficacy in treating uncomplicated diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs). Our institution has obtained good outcomes with DRT in patients with more complicated DFUs. Because of its chronicity, the authors are working to identify a clinical target that anticipates delayed healing early in the treatment in addition to determining the risk factors linked to this endpoint to increase prevention. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective single-center study analyzed patients with DFUs who underwent wound reconstruction using DRT between 2016 and 2021. The patients were categorized into poor or good graft-take groups based on their DRT status on the 21st day after the application. Their relationship with complete healing (CH) rate at day 180 was analyzed. Variables were collected for risk factors for poor graft take at day 21. Independent risk factors were identified after multivariable analysis. The causes of poor graft take were also reported. RESULTS: This study examined 80 patients (38 and 42 patients in the poor and good graft-take groups, respectively). On day 180, the CH rate was 86.3% overall, but the poor graft-take group had a significantly lower CH rate (76.3 vs. 95.2%, P =0.021) than the good graft-take group. Our analysis identified four independent risk factors: transcutaneous oxygen pressure less than 30 mmHg (odds ratio, 154.14), off-loading device usage (0.03), diabetic neuropathy (6.51), and toe wound (0.20). The most frequent cause of poor graft take was infection (44.7%), followed by vascular compromise (21.1%) and hematoma (15.8%). CONCLUSION: Our study introduces the novel concept of poor graft take at day 21 associated with delayed wound healing. Four independent risk factors were identified, which allows physicians to arrange interventions to mitigate their effects or select patients more precisely. DRT represents a viable alternative to address DFUs, even in complicated wounds. A subsequent split-thickness skin graft is not always necessary to achieve CH.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85185220383&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85185220383&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1097/JS9.0000000000000898
DO - 10.1097/JS9.0000000000000898
M3 - Article
C2 - 38085826
AN - SCOPUS:85185220383
SN - 1743-9191
VL - 110
SP - 943
EP - 955
JO - International journal of surgery (London, England)
JF - International journal of surgery (London, England)
IS - 2
ER -