TY - JOUR
T1 - Early detection of breast cancer rectifies inequality of breast cancer outcomes
AU - Tabár, László
AU - Chen, Tony Hsiu Hsi
AU - Yen, Amy Ming Fang
AU - Dean, Peter B.
AU - Smith, Robert A.
AU - Jonsson, Håkan
AU - Törnberg, Sven
AU - Chen, Sam Li Sheng
AU - Chiu, Sherry Yueh Hsia
AU - Fann, Jean Ching Yuan
AU - Ku, May Mei Sheng
AU - Wu, Wendy Yi Ying
AU - Hsu, Chen Yang
AU - Chen, Yu Ching
AU - Svane, Gunilla
AU - Azavedo, Edward
AU - Grundström, Helene
AU - Sundén, Per
AU - Leifland, Karin
AU - Frodis, Ewa
AU - Ramos, Joakim
AU - Epstein, Birgitta
AU - Åkerlund, Anders
AU - Sundbom, Ann
AU - Bordás, Pál
AU - Wallin, Hans
AU - Starck, Leena
AU - Björkgren, Annika
AU - Carlson, Stina
AU - Fredriksson, Irma
AU - Ahlgren, Johan
AU - Öhman, Daniel
AU - Holmberg, Lars
AU - Duffy, Stephen W.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s) 2020.
PY - 2020
Y1 - 2020
N2 - Objectives: To explain apparent differences among mammography screening services in Sweden using individual data on participation in screening and with breast cancer–specific survival as an outcome. Methods: We analysed breast cancer survival data from the Swedish Cancer Register on breast cancer cases from nine Swedish counties diagnosed in women eligible for screening. Data were available on 38,278 breast cancers diagnosed and 4312 breast cancer deaths. Survival to death from breast cancer was estimated using the Kaplan–Meier estimate, for all cases in each county, and separately for cases of women participating and not participating in their last invitation to screening. Formal statistical comparisons of survival were made using proportional hazards regression. Results: All counties showed a reduction in the hazard of breast cancer death with participation in screening, but the reductions for individual counties varied substantially, ranging from 51% (95% confidence interval 46–55%) to 81% (95% confidence interval 74–85%). Survival rates in nonparticipating women ranged from 53% (95% confidence interval 40–65%) to 74% (95% confidence interval 72–77%), while the corresponding survival in women participating in screening varied from 80% (95% confidence interval 77–84%) to 86% (95% confidence interval 83–88%), a considerably narrower range. Conclusions: Differences among counties in the effect of screening on breast cancer outcomes were mainly due to variation in survival in women not participating in screening. Screening conferred similarly high survival rates in all counties. This indicates that the performance of screening services was similar across counties and that detection and treatment of breast cancer in early-stage reduces inequalities in breast cancer outcome.
AB - Objectives: To explain apparent differences among mammography screening services in Sweden using individual data on participation in screening and with breast cancer–specific survival as an outcome. Methods: We analysed breast cancer survival data from the Swedish Cancer Register on breast cancer cases from nine Swedish counties diagnosed in women eligible for screening. Data were available on 38,278 breast cancers diagnosed and 4312 breast cancer deaths. Survival to death from breast cancer was estimated using the Kaplan–Meier estimate, for all cases in each county, and separately for cases of women participating and not participating in their last invitation to screening. Formal statistical comparisons of survival were made using proportional hazards regression. Results: All counties showed a reduction in the hazard of breast cancer death with participation in screening, but the reductions for individual counties varied substantially, ranging from 51% (95% confidence interval 46–55%) to 81% (95% confidence interval 74–85%). Survival rates in nonparticipating women ranged from 53% (95% confidence interval 40–65%) to 74% (95% confidence interval 72–77%), while the corresponding survival in women participating in screening varied from 80% (95% confidence interval 77–84%) to 86% (95% confidence interval 83–88%), a considerably narrower range. Conclusions: Differences among counties in the effect of screening on breast cancer outcomes were mainly due to variation in survival in women not participating in screening. Screening conferred similarly high survival rates in all counties. This indicates that the performance of screening services was similar across counties and that detection and treatment of breast cancer in early-stage reduces inequalities in breast cancer outcome.
KW - Breast cancer, breast cancer screening, early detection, breast cancer survival
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85090065823&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85090065823&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - https://www.mendeley.com/catalogue/48c6aaed-5f5e-3981-bec1-e3ac00d15899/
U2 - 10.1177/0969141320921210
DO - 10.1177/0969141320921210
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85090065823
SN - 0969-1413
VL - 28
SP - 34
EP - 38
JO - Journal of Medical Screening
JF - Journal of Medical Screening
IS - 1
ER -