Abstract
Background. This study compared the stroke-free survival rates and hazard ratios (HRs) for stroke between preeclamptic women who received general anaesthesia and those who received neuraxial anaesthesia for Caesarean section (CS). Methods. This study used 2002-7 data from the Taiwan National Health Insurance Research Database. The stroke-free survival rate was estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method. The log-rank test was used to examine the difference in the stroke-free survival rates between general, spinal, and epidural anaesthesia. The Cox proportional hazard regression was used to estimate the HR for general anaesthesia. Results. A total of 303 862 women underwent CS of which 8567 had preeclampsia (75 stroke cases) and 295 295 did not (303 stroke cases). The stroke-free survival rate was significantly lower in the preeclamptic women who received general anaesthesia when compared with those who received epidural (P=0.008) or spinal anaesthesia (P
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 818-826 |
Number of pages | 9 |
Journal | British Journal of Anaesthesia |
Volume | 105 |
Issue number | 6 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - Dec 2010 |
Keywords
- Caesarean section
- anaesthesia
- preeclampsia
- stroke
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine