TY - JOUR
T1 - Complications of diagnostic electrophysiologic studies and radiofrequency catheter ablation in patients with tachyarrhythmias
T2 - An eight-year survey of 3,966 consecutive procedures in a tertiary referral center
AU - Chen, Shih Ann
AU - Chiang, Chern En
AU - Tai, Ching Tai
AU - Cheng, Chen Chuen
AU - Chiou, Chuen Wang
AU - Lee, Shih Huang
AU - Ueng, Kwo Chang
AU - Wen, Zu Chi
AU - Chang, Mau Song
N1 - Funding Information:
Frcm &he Division of Cardioloqy, Department of Medicine, National Yanq-Ming University, Schoorbf Mkdicine, and Veterans General Hosbital-Taioei. Taiwan. Reoublic of China. This studv was suooort-ed i;l part I$ &ants 86-23’3 1 -BO 100 18 and 84-23’3 1 -BO7%04 from the National Science Council, Taipei, Taiwan, Republic of China. Manuscript received June 28, 1995; revised manuscript received and accepted September 5, 1995.
PY - 1996/1/1
Y1 - 1996/1/1
N2 - Predictors and comparisons of complications in patients with electrophysiologic study or radiofrequency ablation have not been assessed in previous published reports. The purpose of this study was to prospectively evaluate the procedure-specific complications and investigate the possible causes and predictors of complications in electrophysiologic study and radiofrequency ablation. Data of diagnostic electrophysiologic studies and radiofrequency ablation were prospective, and represented a consecutive series of 2,593 patients with 3,966 procedures. The present study showed that a significantly higher complication rate occurred in radiofrequency ablation than in electrophysiologic study (3.1% vs 1.1%, respectively, p = 0.00002) and a significantly higher complication rate occurred in elderly than in young patients with electrophysiologic study (2.2% vs 0.5%, p = 0.0002) or radiofrequency ablation (6.1% vs 2.0%, p = 0.00015). Multiple logistic analysis found that older age (p <0.01) and systemic disease in elderly patients (p <0.01) were the independent predictors of complications in both procedures. Furthermore, there was no temporal trend in the incidence of complication. We conclude that the incidence of complication was higher in radiofrequency ablation, and elderly patients had a higher incidence of complications in both electrophysiologic study and radiofrequency ablation; these procedures, when performed by experienced personnel in an appropriately staffed and equipped laboratory, can be undertaken with an acceptable risk.
AB - Predictors and comparisons of complications in patients with electrophysiologic study or radiofrequency ablation have not been assessed in previous published reports. The purpose of this study was to prospectively evaluate the procedure-specific complications and investigate the possible causes and predictors of complications in electrophysiologic study and radiofrequency ablation. Data of diagnostic electrophysiologic studies and radiofrequency ablation were prospective, and represented a consecutive series of 2,593 patients with 3,966 procedures. The present study showed that a significantly higher complication rate occurred in radiofrequency ablation than in electrophysiologic study (3.1% vs 1.1%, respectively, p = 0.00002) and a significantly higher complication rate occurred in elderly than in young patients with electrophysiologic study (2.2% vs 0.5%, p = 0.0002) or radiofrequency ablation (6.1% vs 2.0%, p = 0.00015). Multiple logistic analysis found that older age (p <0.01) and systemic disease in elderly patients (p <0.01) were the independent predictors of complications in both procedures. Furthermore, there was no temporal trend in the incidence of complication. We conclude that the incidence of complication was higher in radiofrequency ablation, and elderly patients had a higher incidence of complications in both electrophysiologic study and radiofrequency ablation; these procedures, when performed by experienced personnel in an appropriately staffed and equipped laboratory, can be undertaken with an acceptable risk.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0030044603&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0030044603&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/S0002-9149(97)89132-1
DO - 10.1016/S0002-9149(97)89132-1
M3 - Article
C2 - 8540455
AN - SCOPUS:0030044603
SN - 0002-9149
VL - 77
SP - 41
EP - 46
JO - American Journal of Cardiology
JF - American Journal of Cardiology
IS - 1
ER -