Comparison of the Taiwanese versions of the Addenbrooke's Cognitive Examination-III (ACE-III), Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), and Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MOCA) for screening mild cognitive impairment among older Taiwanese people

Jhan Yi Lin; Hui Chuan Hsu; Jiun Yi Wang; Wen Chen Ouyang

doi:10.6890/IJGE.201906_13(2).0013

Comparison of the Taiwanese versions of the Addenbrooke's Cognitive Examination-III (ACE-III), Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), and Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MOCA) for screening mild cognitive impairment among older Taiwanese people

Jhan Yi Lin, Hui Chuan Hsu, Jiun Yi Wang, Wen Chen Ouyang

School of Public Health

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: The purpose of this study was to screen for mild cognitive impairment among a sample of older Taiwanese adults with the Addenbrooke's Cognitive Examination-III (ACE-III) Taiwanese version (TACE-III) based on a comparison with Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) and Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA). Methods: A total of 145 participants aged 65 or above were enrolled by convenient sampling in the communities. The ACE-III was translated into a Taiwanese version (TACE-III) and modified. The TACE-III, MMSE, and MoCA were compared, and the ROC curve was applied to the suggested cutoff points. Results: When using MMSE and MoCA to validate the ROC curve, the closest cut-off point for TACE-III between the two validations was suggested to be a score of 76.5 to screen for mild cognitive impairment with a sensitivity = 84% and a specificity = 85%. The consistency levels among the cognitive function domains across the 3 scales were also compared. Conclusion: TACE-III is a potentially more useful tool for screening MCI.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	162-166
Number of pages	5
Journal	International Journal of Gerontology
Volume	13
Issue number	2
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.6890/IJGE.201906_13(2).0013
Publication status	Published - Jan 1 2019

Keywords

ACE-III
Cognitive assessment
Mild cognitive impairment (MCI)

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Geriatrics and Gerontology

Access to Document

10.6890/IJGE.201906_13(2).0013

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Comparison of the Taiwanese versions of the Addenbrooke's Cognitive Examination-III (ACE-III), Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), and Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MOCA) for screening mild cognitive impairment among older Taiwanese people'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this

Lin, J. Y., Hsu, H. C., Wang, J. Y., & Ouyang, W. C. (2019). Comparison of the Taiwanese versions of the Addenbrooke's Cognitive Examination-III (ACE-III), Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), and Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MOCA) for screening mild cognitive impairment among older Taiwanese people. International Journal of Gerontology, 13(2), 162-166. https://doi.org/10.6890/IJGE.201906_13(2).0013

Comparison of the Taiwanese versions of the Addenbrooke's Cognitive Examination-III (ACE-III), Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), and Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MOCA) for screening mild cognitive impairment among older Taiwanese people. / Lin, Jhan Yi; Hsu, Hui Chuan; Wang, Jiun Yi et al.
In: International Journal of Gerontology, Vol. 13, No. 2, 01.01.2019, p. 162-166.

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

Lin, JY, Hsu, HC, Wang, JY & Ouyang, WC 2019, 'Comparison of the Taiwanese versions of the Addenbrooke's Cognitive Examination-III (ACE-III), Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), and Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MOCA) for screening mild cognitive impairment among older Taiwanese people', International Journal of Gerontology, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 162-166. https://doi.org/10.6890/IJGE.201906_13(2).0013

Lin JY, Hsu HC, Wang JY, Ouyang WC. Comparison of the Taiwanese versions of the Addenbrooke's Cognitive Examination-III (ACE-III), Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), and Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MOCA) for screening mild cognitive impairment among older Taiwanese people. International Journal of Gerontology. 2019 Jan 1;13(2):162-166. doi: 10.6890/IJGE.201906_13(2).0013

Lin, Jhan Yi ; Hsu, Hui Chuan ; Wang, Jiun Yi et al. / Comparison of the Taiwanese versions of the Addenbrooke's Cognitive Examination-III (ACE-III), Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), and Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MOCA) for screening mild cognitive impairment among older Taiwanese people. In: International Journal of Gerontology. 2019 ; Vol. 13, No. 2. pp. 162-166.

@article{01f23637ca57443c8ebf12440df89f9f,

title = "Comparison of the Taiwanese versions of the Addenbrooke's Cognitive Examination-III (ACE-III), Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), and Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MOCA) for screening mild cognitive impairment among older Taiwanese people",

abstract = "Background: The purpose of this study was to screen for mild cognitive impairment among a sample of older Taiwanese adults with the Addenbrooke's Cognitive Examination-III (ACE-III) Taiwanese version (TACE-III) based on a comparison with Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) and Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA). Methods: A total of 145 participants aged 65 or above were enrolled by convenient sampling in the communities. The ACE-III was translated into a Taiwanese version (TACE-III) and modified. The TACE-III, MMSE, and MoCA were compared, and the ROC curve was applied to the suggested cutoff points. Results: When using MMSE and MoCA to validate the ROC curve, the closest cut-off point for TACE-III between the two validations was suggested to be a score of 76.5 to screen for mild cognitive impairment with a sensitivity = 84% and a specificity = 85%. The consistency levels among the cognitive function domains across the 3 scales were also compared. Conclusion: TACE-III is a potentially more useful tool for screening MCI.",

keywords = "ACE-III, Cognitive assessment, Mild cognitive impairment (MCI)",

author = "Lin, {Jhan Yi} and Hsu, {Hui Chuan} and Wang, {Jiun Yi} and Ouyang, {Wen Chen}",

note = "Publisher Copyright: Copyright {\textcopyright} 2019, Taiwan Society of Geriatric Emergency & Critical Care Medicine.",

year = "2019",

month = jan,

day = "1",

doi = "10.6890/IJGE.201906_13(2).0013",

language = "English",

volume = "13",

pages = "162--166",

journal = "International Journal of Gerontology",

issn = "1873-9598",

publisher = "Elsevier Taiwan LLC",

number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparison of the Taiwanese versions of the Addenbrooke's Cognitive Examination-III (ACE-III), Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), and Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MOCA) for screening mild cognitive impairment among older Taiwanese people

AU - Lin, Jhan Yi

AU - Hsu, Hui Chuan

AU - Wang, Jiun Yi

AU - Ouyang, Wen Chen

PY - 2019/1/1

Y1 - 2019/1/1

N2 - Background: The purpose of this study was to screen for mild cognitive impairment among a sample of older Taiwanese adults with the Addenbrooke's Cognitive Examination-III (ACE-III) Taiwanese version (TACE-III) based on a comparison with Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) and Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA). Methods: A total of 145 participants aged 65 or above were enrolled by convenient sampling in the communities. The ACE-III was translated into a Taiwanese version (TACE-III) and modified. The TACE-III, MMSE, and MoCA were compared, and the ROC curve was applied to the suggested cutoff points. Results: When using MMSE and MoCA to validate the ROC curve, the closest cut-off point for TACE-III between the two validations was suggested to be a score of 76.5 to screen for mild cognitive impairment with a sensitivity = 84% and a specificity = 85%. The consistency levels among the cognitive function domains across the 3 scales were also compared. Conclusion: TACE-III is a potentially more useful tool for screening MCI.

AB - Background: The purpose of this study was to screen for mild cognitive impairment among a sample of older Taiwanese adults with the Addenbrooke's Cognitive Examination-III (ACE-III) Taiwanese version (TACE-III) based on a comparison with Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) and Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA). Methods: A total of 145 participants aged 65 or above were enrolled by convenient sampling in the communities. The ACE-III was translated into a Taiwanese version (TACE-III) and modified. The TACE-III, MMSE, and MoCA were compared, and the ROC curve was applied to the suggested cutoff points. Results: When using MMSE and MoCA to validate the ROC curve, the closest cut-off point for TACE-III between the two validations was suggested to be a score of 76.5 to screen for mild cognitive impairment with a sensitivity = 84% and a specificity = 85%. The consistency levels among the cognitive function domains across the 3 scales were also compared. Conclusion: TACE-III is a potentially more useful tool for screening MCI.

KW - ACE-III

KW - Cognitive assessment

KW - Mild cognitive impairment (MCI)

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85073834587&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85073834587&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.6890/IJGE.201906_13(2).0013

DO - 10.6890/IJGE.201906_13(2).0013

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85073834587

SN - 1873-9598

VL - 13

SP - 162

EP - 166

JO - International Journal of Gerontology

JF - International Journal of Gerontology

IS - 2

ER -

Comparison of the Taiwanese versions of the Addenbrooke's Cognitive Examination-III (ACE-III), Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), and Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MOCA) for screening mild cognitive impairment among older Taiwanese people

Abstract

Keywords

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this