TY - JOUR
T1 - Comparison of Second-Phase Insulin Secretion Derived from Standard and Modified Low-Dose Graded Glucose Infusion Tests
AU - Lin, Jiunn Diann
AU - Wu, Chung Ze
AU - Tang, Wen Hao
AU - Kuo, Feng Chih
AU - Pei, Dee
AU - Liang, Yao Jen
AU - Chen, Yen Lin
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2016 Canadian Diabetes Association
PY - 2016/12/1
Y1 - 2016/12/1
N2 - Objectives: Insulin secretion has 2 phases, first-phase and second-phase insulin secretion (SPIS). The purpose of our study was to validate the SPIS derived from the modified low-dose graded glucose infusion test (MLDGGI) by using the standard SPIS derived from the low-dose graded glucose infusion test (LDGGI). Methods: Fourteen participants were enrolled. The participants underwent the LDGGI for 200 minutes and MLDGGI for 60 minutes. The LDGGI was administered using the standard Polonsky method, which entails 5 40-minute stages of glucose infusion (1, 4, 8, 6 and 24 mg/kg/min). The slopes of the insulin levels vs. the glucose levels obtained during the test were regarded as SPIS (SPIS-I). Furthermore, deconvolution was performed, and slopes of the insulin secretion rate (ISR) against glucose levels during the test (SPIS-D) were obtained and regarded as the gold standard SPIS. The MLDGGI was administered with 3 20-minute stages of glucose infusion (2, 8 and 24 mg/kg/min) for 20 minutes each. The slopes of the insulin levels vs. the glucose levels obtained during the test were regarded as SPIS (MSPIS-I). In addition, deconvolution was performed, and the slopes of the ISR against glucose levels during the test (MSPIS-D) were obtained. Results: Significant correlations were observed between SPIS-I and SPIS-D (r=0.843; p
AB - Objectives: Insulin secretion has 2 phases, first-phase and second-phase insulin secretion (SPIS). The purpose of our study was to validate the SPIS derived from the modified low-dose graded glucose infusion test (MLDGGI) by using the standard SPIS derived from the low-dose graded glucose infusion test (LDGGI). Methods: Fourteen participants were enrolled. The participants underwent the LDGGI for 200 minutes and MLDGGI for 60 minutes. The LDGGI was administered using the standard Polonsky method, which entails 5 40-minute stages of glucose infusion (1, 4, 8, 6 and 24 mg/kg/min). The slopes of the insulin levels vs. the glucose levels obtained during the test were regarded as SPIS (SPIS-I). Furthermore, deconvolution was performed, and slopes of the insulin secretion rate (ISR) against glucose levels during the test (SPIS-D) were obtained and regarded as the gold standard SPIS. The MLDGGI was administered with 3 20-minute stages of glucose infusion (2, 8 and 24 mg/kg/min) for 20 minutes each. The slopes of the insulin levels vs. the glucose levels obtained during the test were regarded as SPIS (MSPIS-I). In addition, deconvolution was performed, and the slopes of the ISR against glucose levels during the test (MSPIS-D) were obtained. Results: Significant correlations were observed between SPIS-I and SPIS-D (r=0.843; p
KW - low-dose graded glucose infusion test
KW - modified low-dose graded glucose infusion test
KW - second-phase insulin secretion
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84970003936&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84970003936&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jcjd.2016.03.007
DO - 10.1016/j.jcjd.2016.03.007
M3 - Article
C2 - 27247269
AN - SCOPUS:84970003936
SN - 1499-2671
VL - 40
SP - 529
EP - 534
JO - Canadian Journal of Diabetes
JF - Canadian Journal of Diabetes
IS - 6
ER -