TY - JOUR
T1 - Comparison of efficacy and safety of gabapentin and duloxetine in painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy
T2 - A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials
AU - Ko, Yuan Chun
AU - Lee, Che Hsiung
AU - Wu, Chung Sheng
AU - Huang, Yu Jui
N1 - Funding Information:
The authors would like to acknowledge Wallace Academic Editing for English editing of the manuscript, the Laboratory Animal Center at Taipei Medical University, and Taipei Medical University Hospital (108TMUH-NE-05) for support in this study.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 John Wiley & Sons Ltd
PY - 2021/11
Y1 - 2021/11
N2 - Background: In patients with diabetes mellitus, painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy (PDPN) is a frequent complication and can cause poor quality of life. We compared the efficacy and safety of duloxetine with those of gabapentin in patients with PDPN through a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. Materials and Methods: PubMed, Embase and the Cochrane Library were searched for eligible studies published from database inception to January 2021. Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), sleep interference score, Clinical Global Impression of Change (CGIC), Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC), Diabetic Neuropathy Symptom (DNS) score, Diabetic Neuropathic Examination (DNE) score, Neuropathic Disability Score (NDS) and side effects were used to compare duloxetine and gabapentin in patients with PDPN. Results: Three eligible randomised controlled trials involving 290 patients were included. No significant differences were observed between patients receiving duloxetine and gabapentin with respect to VAS (mean change difference = −1.23, 95% CI, −6.09 to 3.62; P =.62), sleep interference score (mean change difference = 0.42, 95% CI, −0.15 to 1.00; P =.15), CGIC (mean difference = 0.04, 95% CI, −0.11 to 0.20; P =.60), PGIC (mean difference= 0.24, 95% CI, −0.13 to 0.60; P =.21), DNS (mean change difference = 0.14, 95% CI, −0.35 to 0.63; P =.58), DNE (mean change difference = 0.26, 95% CI, −0.35 to 0.86; P =.41) and NDS (mean change difference = 0.30, 95% CI, −0.02 to 0.63; P =.07). Conclusions: No significant differences were observed in the efficacy of duloxetine and gabapentin when treating patients with PDPN.
AB - Background: In patients with diabetes mellitus, painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy (PDPN) is a frequent complication and can cause poor quality of life. We compared the efficacy and safety of duloxetine with those of gabapentin in patients with PDPN through a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. Materials and Methods: PubMed, Embase and the Cochrane Library were searched for eligible studies published from database inception to January 2021. Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), sleep interference score, Clinical Global Impression of Change (CGIC), Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC), Diabetic Neuropathy Symptom (DNS) score, Diabetic Neuropathic Examination (DNE) score, Neuropathic Disability Score (NDS) and side effects were used to compare duloxetine and gabapentin in patients with PDPN. Results: Three eligible randomised controlled trials involving 290 patients were included. No significant differences were observed between patients receiving duloxetine and gabapentin with respect to VAS (mean change difference = −1.23, 95% CI, −6.09 to 3.62; P =.62), sleep interference score (mean change difference = 0.42, 95% CI, −0.15 to 1.00; P =.15), CGIC (mean difference = 0.04, 95% CI, −0.11 to 0.20; P =.60), PGIC (mean difference= 0.24, 95% CI, −0.13 to 0.60; P =.21), DNS (mean change difference = 0.14, 95% CI, −0.35 to 0.63; P =.58), DNE (mean change difference = 0.26, 95% CI, −0.35 to 0.86; P =.41) and NDS (mean change difference = 0.30, 95% CI, −0.02 to 0.63; P =.07). Conclusions: No significant differences were observed in the efficacy of duloxetine and gabapentin when treating patients with PDPN.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85109629862&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85109629862&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1111/ijcp.14576
DO - 10.1111/ijcp.14576
M3 - Article
C2 - 34171158
AN - SCOPUS:85109629862
SN - 1368-5031
VL - 75
JO - International Journal of Clinical Practice
JF - International Journal of Clinical Practice
IS - 11
M1 - e14576
ER -