Comparative analysis of the retention force and deformation of PEEK and PEKK removable partial denture clasps with different thicknesses and undercut depths

Wei Fang Lee, May Show Chen, Tzu Yu Peng, Peng Chien Huang, Hiroki Nikawa, Pei Wen Peng

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Statement of problem: The retentive force and deformation of milled polyetheretherketone (PEEK) and polyetherketoneketone (PEKK) removable partial denture (RPD) frameworks are not well understood. Purpose: The purpose of this in vitro study was to assess the retentive force and deformation of PEEK and PEKK Akers clasps with different designs and undercut depths. Material and methods: A master model containing the first and second molar abutments was used to design Akers clasps of different cross-sectional dimensions, undercut depths (0.5 and 0.75 mm), and materials. The components of the removable partial denture framework also included an occlusal rest and were manufactured using a milling machine (n=5). The fatigue resistance of the Akers clasps was measured before and after deformation regarding the retentive forces. Results: The PEEK2-U50 clasp had the largest retentive force with no significant difference among all groups before and after the insertion and removal cycle. In addition, the increased cross-sectional dimensions of the design resulted in significant differences in retentive forces between the PEEK1 and PEEK2 groups and between the PEEK and PEKK materials. Conclusions: Increasing the clasp's cross-sectional dimensions significantly impacted retentive forces, especially between different PEEK groups and between PEEK and PEKK materials.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)291.e1-291.e9
JournalJournal of Prosthetic Dentistry
Volume131
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2024

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Oral Surgery
  • General Dentistry

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Comparative analysis of the retention force and deformation of PEEK and PEKK removable partial denture clasps with different thicknesses and undercut depths'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this