TY - JOUR
T1 - Chinese-Australians' knowledge of depression and schizophrenia in the context of their under-utilization of mental health care
T2 - An analysis of labelling
AU - Klimidis, Steven
AU - Shiau, Fei-Shiou
AU - Minas, Iraklis Harry
PY - 2007/9
Y1 - 2007/9
N2 - Background: Low knowledge of and discrimination regarding mental disorders (MDs) may underpin lower access to mental health care by ethnic minority groups. Aims: In Chinese-Australians, in relation to schizophrenia and depression, to assess (a) labels attached to MDs, (b) conceptual distinctiveness of MDs, (c) labelling accuracy against an Australian representative sample, (d) how syndrome variations may influence labelling, and (e) effects of exposure to MDs on labelling. Method: 418 subjects were asked to indicate the labels they would apply to vignettes of depression and schizophrenia and whether they were exposed to these disorders personally or socially. Results: The sample was broadly representative of the Australian-Chinese community: 51% and 47% 'correctly' labelled the vignettes. Depression and schizophrenia labels were consistently discriminated and clustered with different other labels. Labelling accuracy surpassed Australians'. Labelling did not vary substantially between syndromes. Exposure related to increased labelling accuracy for depression. Conclusions: Accuracy in labelling major forms of MDs does not appear low in Chinese-Australians and seems higher than in the Australian community. MDs were discriminated although syndrome variations were not. Findings dispute that low mental health care access and uptake is due to low recognition and discrimination of MDs in Chinese-Australians.
AB - Background: Low knowledge of and discrimination regarding mental disorders (MDs) may underpin lower access to mental health care by ethnic minority groups. Aims: In Chinese-Australians, in relation to schizophrenia and depression, to assess (a) labels attached to MDs, (b) conceptual distinctiveness of MDs, (c) labelling accuracy against an Australian representative sample, (d) how syndrome variations may influence labelling, and (e) effects of exposure to MDs on labelling. Method: 418 subjects were asked to indicate the labels they would apply to vignettes of depression and schizophrenia and whether they were exposed to these disorders personally or socially. Results: The sample was broadly representative of the Australian-Chinese community: 51% and 47% 'correctly' labelled the vignettes. Depression and schizophrenia labels were consistently discriminated and clustered with different other labels. Labelling accuracy surpassed Australians'. Labelling did not vary substantially between syndromes. Exposure related to increased labelling accuracy for depression. Conclusions: Accuracy in labelling major forms of MDs does not appear low in Chinese-Australians and seems higher than in the Australian community. MDs were discriminated although syndrome variations were not. Findings dispute that low mental health care access and uptake is due to low recognition and discrimination of MDs in Chinese-Australians.
KW - Chinese
KW - Depression
KW - Ethnic minority groups
KW - Explanatory models
KW - Illness labels
KW - Mental health literacy
KW - Schizophrenia
KW - Service utilization
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=34548717755&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=34548717755&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1177/0020764007078357
DO - 10.1177/0020764007078357
M3 - Article
C2 - 18018667
AN - SCOPUS:34548717755
SN - 0020-7640
VL - 53
SP - 464
EP - 478
JO - International Journal of Social Psychiatry
JF - International Journal of Social Psychiatry
IS - 5
ER -