TY - JOUR
T1 - Brief report
T2 - Development of a prescription medication information webliography for consumers
AU - Ko, Yu
AU - Brown, Mary
AU - Frost, Rowan
AU - Woosley, Raymond L.
N1 - Funding Information:
We thank Drs. Lane Johnson, Amy Grizzle, Jacob Abarca, and Edward Armstrong for their thoughtful comments on the assessment criteria. We appreciate Drs. Dan C. Malone and Jacob Abarca's comments on an early draft of this manuscript. We are grateful for assistance from the medical librarians at the Arizona Health Sciences Library and for website evaluation provided by Cynthia A. Condit. Financial Disclosure: None. Grant Support: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality multi-year grant (HS10385) to the Arizona Center for Education and Research on Therapeutics.
PY - 2006/12
Y1 - 2006/12
N2 - BACKGROUND: Websites offering drug information vary in coverage and quality, and most health care consumers are poorly equipped to assess the quality of internet medication information. OBJECTIVE: To establish a webliography of recommended prescription medication information websites for health care consumers and providers. DESIGN AND METHODS: Drug information websites were systematically identified based on recommendations from health professionals and text-word searches of MEDLINE and Google. The resulting sample of websites was evaluated in a 2-step process. Candidate websites were first screened using inclusion/exclusion criteria representing minimum information requirements. Websites that passed the inclusion/exclusion criteria were then rated on 16 quality criteria using a 5-point scale by 3 trained judges. Website ratings were averaged, then multiplied by the corresponding importance weight of each criterion and summed to generate a total score. Websites with the highest total scores were included in the webliography. RESULTS: Ten websites were selected for inclusion in the webliography. The 3 highest-scoring websites were Anthem Blue Cross and Blue Shield (), U.S. National Library of Medicine (), and Healthvision (). CONCLUSION: Medication information websites vary widely in quality and content. The online webliography is a valuable and easily accessed tool that can be recommended by health care professionals to patients who request referral to reliable websites.
AB - BACKGROUND: Websites offering drug information vary in coverage and quality, and most health care consumers are poorly equipped to assess the quality of internet medication information. OBJECTIVE: To establish a webliography of recommended prescription medication information websites for health care consumers and providers. DESIGN AND METHODS: Drug information websites were systematically identified based on recommendations from health professionals and text-word searches of MEDLINE and Google. The resulting sample of websites was evaluated in a 2-step process. Candidate websites were first screened using inclusion/exclusion criteria representing minimum information requirements. Websites that passed the inclusion/exclusion criteria were then rated on 16 quality criteria using a 5-point scale by 3 trained judges. Website ratings were averaged, then multiplied by the corresponding importance weight of each criterion and summed to generate a total score. Websites with the highest total scores were included in the webliography. RESULTS: Ten websites were selected for inclusion in the webliography. The 3 highest-scoring websites were Anthem Blue Cross and Blue Shield (), U.S. National Library of Medicine (), and Healthvision (). CONCLUSION: Medication information websites vary widely in quality and content. The online webliography is a valuable and easily accessed tool that can be recommended by health care professionals to patients who request referral to reliable websites.
KW - Internet
KW - Medication information
KW - Prescription drug information
KW - Webliography
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33750508154&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33750508154&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1111/j.1525-1497.2006.00620.x
DO - 10.1111/j.1525-1497.2006.00620.x
M3 - Article
C2 - 16995894
AN - SCOPUS:33750508154
SN - 0884-8734
VL - 21
SP - 1313
EP - 1316
JO - Journal of General Internal Medicine
JF - Journal of General Internal Medicine
IS - 12
ER -