TY - JOUR
T1 - Blood loss and the need for transfusion in patients who undergo partial or radical nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma
AU - Shvarts, Oleg
AU - Tsui, Ke Hung
AU - Smith, Robert B.
AU - De Kernion, Jean B.
AU - Belldegrun, Arie
PY - 2000
Y1 - 2000
N2 - Purpose: We assessed blood loss and subsequent transfusion associated with nephrectomy performed for suspected renal cell carcinoma to establish guidelines for preoperative autologous blood donation and identify a subgroup of patients that may benefit from erythropoietin administration. Materials and Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the charts of 211 patients who underwent partial (73%) or radical (23%) nephrectomy for presumed renal cell carcinoma at our institution between 1990 and 1999. Patients were divided into groups 1 - 44.5% treated with radical nephrectomy for localized disease, 2 - 21.3% radical nephrectomy for metastatic lesions invading the renal vasculature or inferior vena cava, 3 - 8% radical nephrectomy for metastatic disease with locally extensive lesions and 4 - 26.5% partial nephrectomy for localized lesions. Patient charts were evaluated for preoperative and postoperative hematocrit, estimated blood loss, transfusions received, surgical complications and underlying disease. Results: Median estimated blood loss was 200, 400, 250 and 555 cc in groups 1 to 4, respectively. However, patients in groups 2 and 3 had a substantially greater range of blood loss than those in groups 1 and 4, respectively. The incidence of those with a blood loss of greater than 11. was 7%, 36%, 24% and 11% in groups 1, to 4, respectively. The incidence of those requiring transfusion was significantly lower in group i than in groups 2 to 4 (18% versus 44%, 24% and 30%, respectively, p <0.009). Mean transfusion requirement plus or minus standard deviation was significantly greater in groups 2 and 3 than in 1 and 4 (2.3 ± 1.08, 5.5 ± 4.4, 11.3 ± 9.6 and 2.3 ± 1.7 units, respectively, p <0.05). No significant difference was noted in the change in hematocrit as a result of surgery in the 4 groups (p >0.05). Similarly underlying disease and operative complications did not have a significant effect on blood loss or transfusion (p >0.05). Conclusions: Radical or partial nephrectomy for localized renal cell carcinoma leads to consistent and well tolerated operative blood loss that rarely results in the need for substantial transfusion. In contrast, nephrectomy for advanced disease may cause a risk of greater blood loss and subsequent need for the transfusion of multiple units of blood. While preoperative autologous blood donation may have limited value in this regard due to the high cost and number of units needed, preoperative erythropoietin administration may be a viable option. Prospective randomized studies are currently planned.
AB - Purpose: We assessed blood loss and subsequent transfusion associated with nephrectomy performed for suspected renal cell carcinoma to establish guidelines for preoperative autologous blood donation and identify a subgroup of patients that may benefit from erythropoietin administration. Materials and Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the charts of 211 patients who underwent partial (73%) or radical (23%) nephrectomy for presumed renal cell carcinoma at our institution between 1990 and 1999. Patients were divided into groups 1 - 44.5% treated with radical nephrectomy for localized disease, 2 - 21.3% radical nephrectomy for metastatic lesions invading the renal vasculature or inferior vena cava, 3 - 8% radical nephrectomy for metastatic disease with locally extensive lesions and 4 - 26.5% partial nephrectomy for localized lesions. Patient charts were evaluated for preoperative and postoperative hematocrit, estimated blood loss, transfusions received, surgical complications and underlying disease. Results: Median estimated blood loss was 200, 400, 250 and 555 cc in groups 1 to 4, respectively. However, patients in groups 2 and 3 had a substantially greater range of blood loss than those in groups 1 and 4, respectively. The incidence of those with a blood loss of greater than 11. was 7%, 36%, 24% and 11% in groups 1, to 4, respectively. The incidence of those requiring transfusion was significantly lower in group i than in groups 2 to 4 (18% versus 44%, 24% and 30%, respectively, p <0.009). Mean transfusion requirement plus or minus standard deviation was significantly greater in groups 2 and 3 than in 1 and 4 (2.3 ± 1.08, 5.5 ± 4.4, 11.3 ± 9.6 and 2.3 ± 1.7 units, respectively, p <0.05). No significant difference was noted in the change in hematocrit as a result of surgery in the 4 groups (p >0.05). Similarly underlying disease and operative complications did not have a significant effect on blood loss or transfusion (p >0.05). Conclusions: Radical or partial nephrectomy for localized renal cell carcinoma leads to consistent and well tolerated operative blood loss that rarely results in the need for substantial transfusion. In contrast, nephrectomy for advanced disease may cause a risk of greater blood loss and subsequent need for the transfusion of multiple units of blood. While preoperative autologous blood donation may have limited value in this regard due to the high cost and number of units needed, preoperative erythropoietin administration may be a viable option. Prospective randomized studies are currently planned.
KW - Autologous
KW - Blood transfusion
KW - Carcinoma
KW - Kidney
KW - Nephrectomy
KW - Renal cell
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0033813029&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0033813029&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/S0022-5347(05)67132-7
DO - 10.1016/S0022-5347(05)67132-7
M3 - Article
C2 - 10992357
AN - SCOPUS:0033813029
SN - 0022-5347
VL - 164
SP - 1160
EP - 1163
JO - Journal of Urology
JF - Journal of Urology
IS - 4
ER -