TY - JOUR
T1 - Association of intensive blood pressure control and kidney disease progression in nondiabetic patients with chronic kidney disease
T2 - A systematic review and meta-analysis
AU - Tsai, Wan Chuan
AU - Wu, Hon Yen
AU - Peng, Yu Sen
AU - Yang, Ju Yeh
AU - Chen, Hung Yuan
AU - Chiu, Yen Ling
AU - Hsu, Shih Ping
AU - Ko, Mei Ju
AU - Pai, Mei Fen
AU - Tu, Yu Kang
AU - Hung, Kuan Yu
AU - Chien, Kuo Liong
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2017 American Medical Association. All rights reserved.
PY - 2017/6
Y1 - 2017/6
N2 - IMPORTANCE: The optimal blood pressure (BP) target remains debated in nondiabetic patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD). OBJECTIVE: To compare intensive BP control (<130/80 mm Hg) with standard BP control (<140/90 mm Hg) on major renal outcomes in patients with CKD without diabetes. DATA SOURCES Searches of PubMed, MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane Library for publications up to March 24, 2016. STUDY SELECTION Randomized clinical trials that compared an intensive vs a standard BP target in nondiabetic adults with CKD, reporting changes in glomerular filtration rate (GFR), doubling of serum creatinine level, 50% reduction in GFR, end-stage renal disease (ESRD), or all-cause mortality. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS Random-effects meta-analyses for pooling effect measures. Meta-regression and subgroup analyses for exploring heterogeneity. MAINOUTCOMES ANDMEASURES: Differences in annual rate of change in GFR were expressed as mean differences with 95% CIs. Differences in doubling of serum creatinine or 50% reduction in GFR, ESRD, composite renal outcome, and all-cause mortality were expressed as risk ratios (RRs) with 95% CIs. RESULTS: We identified 9 trials with 8127 patients and a median follow-up of 3.3 years. Compared with standard BP control, intensive BP control did not show a significant difference on the annual rate of change in GFR (mean difference, 0.07; 95% CI, -0.16 to 0.29 mL/min/1.73 m2/y), doubling of serum creatinine level or 50% reduction in GFR (RR, 0.99; 95% CI, 0.76-1.29), ESRD (RR, 0.96; 95% CI, 0.78-1.18), composite renal outcome (RR, 0.99; 95% CI, 0.81-1.21), or all-cause mortality (RR, 0.95; 95% CI, 0.66-1.37). Nonblacks and patients with higher levels of proteinuria showed a trend of lower risk of kidney disease progression with intensive BP control. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Targeting BP below the current standard did not provide additional benefit for renal outcomes compared with standard treatment during a follow-up of 3.3 years in patients with CKD without diabetes. However, nonblack patients or those with higher levels of proteinuria might benefit from the intensive BP-lowering treatments.
AB - IMPORTANCE: The optimal blood pressure (BP) target remains debated in nondiabetic patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD). OBJECTIVE: To compare intensive BP control (<130/80 mm Hg) with standard BP control (<140/90 mm Hg) on major renal outcomes in patients with CKD without diabetes. DATA SOURCES Searches of PubMed, MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane Library for publications up to March 24, 2016. STUDY SELECTION Randomized clinical trials that compared an intensive vs a standard BP target in nondiabetic adults with CKD, reporting changes in glomerular filtration rate (GFR), doubling of serum creatinine level, 50% reduction in GFR, end-stage renal disease (ESRD), or all-cause mortality. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS Random-effects meta-analyses for pooling effect measures. Meta-regression and subgroup analyses for exploring heterogeneity. MAINOUTCOMES ANDMEASURES: Differences in annual rate of change in GFR were expressed as mean differences with 95% CIs. Differences in doubling of serum creatinine or 50% reduction in GFR, ESRD, composite renal outcome, and all-cause mortality were expressed as risk ratios (RRs) with 95% CIs. RESULTS: We identified 9 trials with 8127 patients and a median follow-up of 3.3 years. Compared with standard BP control, intensive BP control did not show a significant difference on the annual rate of change in GFR (mean difference, 0.07; 95% CI, -0.16 to 0.29 mL/min/1.73 m2/y), doubling of serum creatinine level or 50% reduction in GFR (RR, 0.99; 95% CI, 0.76-1.29), ESRD (RR, 0.96; 95% CI, 0.78-1.18), composite renal outcome (RR, 0.99; 95% CI, 0.81-1.21), or all-cause mortality (RR, 0.95; 95% CI, 0.66-1.37). Nonblacks and patients with higher levels of proteinuria showed a trend of lower risk of kidney disease progression with intensive BP control. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Targeting BP below the current standard did not provide additional benefit for renal outcomes compared with standard treatment during a follow-up of 3.3 years in patients with CKD without diabetes. However, nonblack patients or those with higher levels of proteinuria might benefit from the intensive BP-lowering treatments.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85019170143&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85019170143&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1001/jamainternmed.2017.0197
DO - 10.1001/jamainternmed.2017.0197
M3 - Review article
C2 - 28288249
AN - SCOPUS:85019170143
SN - 2168-6106
VL - 177
SP - 792
EP - 799
JO - JAMA Internal Medicine
JF - JAMA Internal Medicine
IS - 6
ER -