TY - JOUR
T1 - An Optimization Study for the Bone-Implant Interface Performance of Lumbar Vertebral Body Cages Using a Neurogenetic Algorithm and Verification Experiment
AU - Lee, Chian Her
AU - Hsu, Ching Chi
AU - Chaing, Li
N1 - Funding Information:
Acknowledgements This work was sponsored by Taipei Medical University-National Taiwan University of Science and Technology Joint Research Program under the Grant No. TMU-NTUST-103-09.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2017, Taiwanese Society of Biomedical Engineering.
Copyright:
Copyright 2018 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
PY - 2018/2/1
Y1 - 2018/2/1
N2 - Cage loosening continues to be a problem after spinal fusion surgery. Past studies have investigated the interfacial strength of cages in situations of a single loosening direction. However, the human spine can move in different directions; therefore, cage loosening may occur in any direction. The purposes of this study were to develop a novel finite element analysis-based neurogenetic algorithm and to discover the spike design of vertebral body cages (VBCs) with excellent interfacial pullout strength by considering multiple cage loosening directions. Five design variables of VBCs were defined, and three-dimensional finite element models were created to predict the interfacial pullout strength of different VBCs. Then, both the artificial neural network and the genetic algorithm were applied to discover the optimum VBC. Finally, one optimum VBC and five VBCs selected from the Taguchi orthogonal array were tested and compared. The optimum spike design of the VBCs was successfully determined, and the interfacial pullout strength of the optimum VBC design was superior to that of other VBCs (17–77% increase in maximum pullout force). Non-oblique spikes were suggested to enhance their loosening resistances when multiple loosening directions were considered. In conclusion, the optimum spike design revealed excellent interfacial pullout performance of vertebral body cages in multiple loosening directions. The outcome of this study could help surgeons understand the interfacial pullout strength of VBCs in terms of their spike designs, and it could provide design direction to biomechanical engineers.
AB - Cage loosening continues to be a problem after spinal fusion surgery. Past studies have investigated the interfacial strength of cages in situations of a single loosening direction. However, the human spine can move in different directions; therefore, cage loosening may occur in any direction. The purposes of this study were to develop a novel finite element analysis-based neurogenetic algorithm and to discover the spike design of vertebral body cages (VBCs) with excellent interfacial pullout strength by considering multiple cage loosening directions. Five design variables of VBCs were defined, and three-dimensional finite element models were created to predict the interfacial pullout strength of different VBCs. Then, both the artificial neural network and the genetic algorithm were applied to discover the optimum VBC. Finally, one optimum VBC and five VBCs selected from the Taguchi orthogonal array were tested and compared. The optimum spike design of the VBCs was successfully determined, and the interfacial pullout strength of the optimum VBC design was superior to that of other VBCs (17–77% increase in maximum pullout force). Non-oblique spikes were suggested to enhance their loosening resistances when multiple loosening directions were considered. In conclusion, the optimum spike design revealed excellent interfacial pullout performance of vertebral body cages in multiple loosening directions. The outcome of this study could help surgeons understand the interfacial pullout strength of VBCs in terms of their spike designs, and it could provide design direction to biomechanical engineers.
KW - Interface performance
KW - Loosening
KW - Optimization
KW - Verification experiments
KW - Vertebral body cage
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85043332574&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85043332574&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s40846-017-0306-5
DO - 10.1007/s40846-017-0306-5
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85043332574
SN - 1609-0985
VL - 38
SP - 22
EP - 32
JO - Journal of Medical and Biological Engineering
JF - Journal of Medical and Biological Engineering
IS - 1
ER -