An in vitro study of digital impressions and three-dimensional printed models of orbital defects using mobile devices and monoscopic photogrammetry

Kosei Tabira, Riho Kawaguchi, Yuichi Mine, Shogo Iwaguro, Tzu Yu Peng, Yumi Tsuchida, Yukihiro Takayama, Shota Okazaki, Tsuyoshi Taji, Takeshi Murayama

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to perform an in vitro evaluation of digital impressions using a mobile device and monoscopic photogrammetry in cases of orbital defects with undercuts. METHODS: Three 10-mm-square cubes were attached to a diagnostic cast of a patient with a right orbital defect. Still images acquired with a mobile device were used to generate facial three-dimensional (3D) data. Two types of still images were used: one was a whole face image, and the other was a defect site-focused image. For comparison, an extraoral scanner was used to obtain facial 3D data. Five dental technicians fabricated 3D printed models using additive manufacturing and measured the distances between the measurement points using a digital caliper. The discrepancy between the distances measured on the diagnostic cast of the patient and the 3D printed model was calculated. Friedman test was used to analyze the discrepancy, and the Bonferroni test was used to verify the differences between the pairs. RESULTS: Statistical significance was found with respect to the type of 3D model fabrication method. CONCLUSION: Within the limitations of this in vitro study, the results suggested that the workflow can be applied to digital impressions of the maxillofacial region.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)127-130
Number of pages4
JournalJournal of oral science
Volume65
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2023

Keywords

  • additive manufacturing
  • digital workflow
  • maxillofacial prostheses
  • mobile device
  • photogrammetry

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • General Dentistry

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'An in vitro study of digital impressions and three-dimensional printed models of orbital defects using mobile devices and monoscopic photogrammetry'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this