TY - JOUR
T1 - A transfer learning approach on MRI-based radiomics signature for overall survival prediction of low-grade and high-grade gliomas
AU - Le, Viet Huan
AU - Minh, Tran Nguyen Tuan
AU - Kha, Quang Hien
AU - Le, Nguyen Quoc Khanh
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2023, International Federation for Medical and Biological Engineering.
PY - 2023/10
Y1 - 2023/10
N2 - Lower-grade gliomas (LGG) can eventually progress to glioblastoma (GBM) and death. In the context of the transfer learning approach, we aimed to train and test an MRI-based radiomics model for predicting survival in GBM patients and validate it in LGG patients. From each patient’s 704 MRI-based radiomics features, we chose seventeen optimal radiomics signatures in the GBM training set (n = 71) and used these features in both the GBM testing set (n = 31) and LGG validation set (n = 107) for further analysis. Each patient’s risk score, calculated based on those optimal radiomics signatures, was chosen to represent the radiomics model. We compared the radiomics model with clinical, gene status models, and combined model integrating radiomics, clinical, and gene status in predicting survival. The average iAUCs of combined models in training, testing, and validation sets were respectively 0.804, 0.878, and 0.802, and those of radiomics models were 0.798, 0.867, and 0.717. The average iAUCs of gene status and clinical models ranged from 0.522 to 0.735 in all three sets. The radiomics model trained in GBM patients can effectively predict the overall survival of GBM and LGG patients, and the combined model improved this ability. Graphical Abstract: [Figure not available: see fulltext.]
AB - Lower-grade gliomas (LGG) can eventually progress to glioblastoma (GBM) and death. In the context of the transfer learning approach, we aimed to train and test an MRI-based radiomics model for predicting survival in GBM patients and validate it in LGG patients. From each patient’s 704 MRI-based radiomics features, we chose seventeen optimal radiomics signatures in the GBM training set (n = 71) and used these features in both the GBM testing set (n = 31) and LGG validation set (n = 107) for further analysis. Each patient’s risk score, calculated based on those optimal radiomics signatures, was chosen to represent the radiomics model. We compared the radiomics model with clinical, gene status models, and combined model integrating radiomics, clinical, and gene status in predicting survival. The average iAUCs of combined models in training, testing, and validation sets were respectively 0.804, 0.878, and 0.802, and those of radiomics models were 0.798, 0.867, and 0.717. The average iAUCs of gene status and clinical models ranged from 0.522 to 0.735 in all three sets. The radiomics model trained in GBM patients can effectively predict the overall survival of GBM and LGG patients, and the combined model improved this ability. Graphical Abstract: [Figure not available: see fulltext.]
KW - Glioblastoma
KW - Lower-grade gliomas
KW - Nomogram
KW - Prediction model
KW - Radiomics signature
KW - Survival analysis
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85164796712&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85164796712&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s11517-023-02875-2
DO - 10.1007/s11517-023-02875-2
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85164796712
SN - 0140-0118
VL - 61
SP - 2699
EP - 2712
JO - Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing
JF - Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing
IS - 10
ER -