Abstract
A Comparative Study on "Evidence Law" in Constitutional Review: External-Knowledge's Quality Control, Experiential Perspectives, and Their Contribution to the Reasoning of the Taiwanese Constitutional Court and the U.S. Supreme Court
| Translated title of the contribution | A Comparative Study on "Evidence Law" in Constitutional Review: External-Knowledge's Quality Control, Experiential Perspectives, and Their Contribution to the Reasoning of the Taiwanese Constitutional Court and the U.S. Supreme Court |
|---|---|
| Original language | Chinese (Traditional) |
| Pages (from-to) | 251-308 |
| Number of pages | 58 |
| Journal | 中研院法學期刊 |
| Issue number | 20 |
| Publication status | Published - Mar 2017 |
| Externally published | Yes |
Keywords
- Constitutional review
- Evidence law
- External-knowledge
- Experiential perspectives
- Interdisciplinary approaches
- Amicus curiae brief
- Daubert
- Cross-examination