標準骨假體用於評估不同骨密度儀檢測之結果

Translated title of the contribution: Evaluation of Different Dual-energy X-ray Absorptiometry Densitometers Using a Standard Bone Phantom

黃 敏雄(Ming-Shon Huang), 陳 家寅(Chia-Yin Chen), 趙 樹禮(Shu-Li Chao), 杜 興洋(Hsing-Yang Tu), 陳 潤秋(Ran-Chou Chen), 歐 耿良(Keng-Liang Ou), 蕭 文田(Wen-Tien Hsiao)

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Objective: This study evaluated the bone mineral density (BMD) values of a phantom in different models of bone densitometer of a particular brand, and difference estimated. Methods: The Norland series densitometers were applied to evaluate the BMD of a lumbar phantom. The Norland XR 600 was used to scan the lumbar phantom for 15 times and calibrated, and the data used as standard. The imitations were repeated under the same condition using other series of Norland. Results: The SigmaPlot v.12.5 was used to analyze collected data. Difference between standardized phantom BMD and other imitated BMD values was analyzed using one way ANOVA. The p value of bone density, bone content and bone area were less than 0.01, 0.01 and 0.05, respectively. The average of BMD values of different modalities was analyzed by Results (%True) of measurements, and homogeneity of BMD values was indicated. Conclusion: No obvious deviation was observed under different modalities, and the results of examinations may be used in relevant research.
Translated title of the contributionEvaluation of Different Dual-energy X-ray Absorptiometry Densitometers Using a Standard Bone Phantom
Original languageChinese (Traditional)
Pages (from-to)54-61
Number of pages8
Journal北市醫學雜誌
Volume11
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2014

Keywords

  • Quality Calibration
  • Bone Density
  • Bone Content
  • Bone Area

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Evaluation of Different Dual-energy X-ray Absorptiometry Densitometers Using a Standard Bone Phantom'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this