後牙錯咬之擴張矯正治療模式:系統性回顧

Translated title of the contribution: THE ORTHODONTIC EXPANSION TREATMENT OF POSTERIOR CROSSBITE-A SYSTEMIC REVIEW

張雅筑, 鄭信忠, 盧泰良, 陳建鋒, 陳怡君

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

The purposes of this literature review were to evaluate and compare the correction rate of posterior crossbite of different kinds of maxillary expansion. The study selection criteria included RCTs involving subjects with posterior crossbite with maxillary expansion which searched from MEDLINE. The search strategy resulted in 10 articles that fitted to the inclusion criteria from 72 searched papers. Five out of ten articles have low bias risk, which are Martina R et al. (2012), Petren S et al. (2008), Petren S et al. (2011), Godoy F et al. (2011), McNally MR et al. (2005). The result showed there were no significant difference between RME and SME on treating posterior crossbite. Quad-helix showed better result than removable expansion plate. Posterior crossbites did not be spontaneously corrected during the transition into the permanent dentition.
Translated title of the contributionTHE ORTHODONTIC EXPANSION TREATMENT OF POSTERIOR CROSSBITE-A SYSTEMIC REVIEW
Original languageChinese (Traditional)
Pages (from-to)76-89
Number of pages14
Journal中華民國齒顎矯正學雜誌
Volume27
Issue number2
Publication statusPublished - 2016

Keywords

  • Posterior crossbite
  • Orthodontic expansion treatment
  • Systemic review

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'THE ORTHODONTIC EXPANSION TREATMENT OF POSTERIOR CROSSBITE-A SYSTEMIC REVIEW'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this